![]() Donovan, J., respectively.Īfter review by the Appeals Court, the Supreme Judicial Court granted leave to obtain further appellate review.Ĭarol A. Motions for leave to amend the complaint and for entry of separate and final judgment were heard by Gordon L. Meyer, J., on a motion for summary judgment. Motions for summary judgment had been allowed, were properly denied inĬIVIL ACTION commenced in the Superior Court Department on June 15, 1988. ![]() Ī plaintiff's motion to amend its complaint, filed after the defendant's Misrepresentations as to coverage by the insurer's agent were Summary judgment was properly entered for an insurer in an action broughtīy an insured where the policies in question did not provide theĬoverage as claimed and where any reliance by the insured on alleged Rights was a violation of its duty to defend. To investigate and subsequent disclaimer of coverage and reservation of Insured had prevailed in arbitration and whether the insurer's failure The insurer in violation of policy provisions justified the insurer's failure to defend whether the insurer was prejudiced inasmuch as the Whether the insured's initiation of the arbitration without notice to Record demonstrated there remained genuine issues of material fact ![]() On a claim by an insured seeking to recover from its liability insurer the costs associated with arbitration between the insured and a third party, summary judgment was incorrectly entered for the insurer where the Present: LIACOS, C.J., WILKINS, ABRAMS, LYNCH, O'CONNOR, & GREANEY, JJ.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |